Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ate my balls (2nd nomination)
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:15, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ate my balls
AfDs for this article:
- Ate my balls (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable. And probably WP:CB too :p Chzz ► 22:50, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per Chzz. ♫Mr. R00t Talk♫ 22:52, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:10, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Website jokes from 15 years ago are not notable. I do appreciate the chance to read WP:CB though. Cullen328 (talk) 23:19, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or merge into Internet meme. Shii (tock) 02:51, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As an article it fails inclusion criteria at WP:GNG. As content within Internet meme, it might survive. It is entirely possible it could be challenged there as well by the watchers of that article. My76Strat 03:38, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to List of Internet phenomena. Narthring (talk • contribs) 02:36, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and don't even bother with the redirect. This isn't on the level of Hamster Dance, I don't think it even qualifies as a meme. Sven Manguard Talk 04:34, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Dave Barry wrote it up in his book about the Internet Shii (tock) 13:43, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep -- Unfortunately, that's not even a weak keep, it's a very strong keep. Ate My Balls was pretty much the original internet meme and is notable enough for its own article. The article shouldn't be deleted, it needs to be rescued. It is a widespread tasteless phenomenon with hundreds of pages still in existence. Deleting this page would be tantamount to deleting YTMND or eBaum's World. --NINTENDUDE64 20:16, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Satisfies WP:NOTE. Has received significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources independent of the subject. Notable cultural phenomenon and Internet meme. -- Cirt (talk) 02:42, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.