Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asim Hussain

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 15:48, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Asim Hussain (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO. Simply not notable. Group hospital administrator and owner of said hospitals, but not notable. Article reads like an advertisement. Seems to be adviser in Pakistan government for oil and gas, but also on that fails WP:POLITICIAN. scope_creep talk 21:51, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - No elected post as politician nor any major, notable corporate function. NN. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 21:59, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:43, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:44, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:44, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, clearly passes WP:POLITICIAN, as he served as Senator (member of national legislature), see http://tribune.com.pk/story/455735/dual-nationality-dr-asim-hussain-resigns-from-senate/ , http://www.senate.gov.pk/en/profile.php?uid=132 . "Dr Asim Hussain" gets 365,000 google hits, most of which all the first result pages relate to him. Plenty of coverage in key national English-language media like Nation and GeoTV. If we would search in Urdu and Sindhi as well, we'd encounter even more... The article clearly needs a clean-up, but at the same time this is a clear-cut case were an AfD could have been avoided by 3-4 minute research (WP:BEFORE). --Soman (talk) 09:11, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Change of Vote I change my vote to KEEP. Frankly at first I thought there was a name resemblance only, but after looking at the pictures I understand we are only facing an article which is not up-to-date. Sorry. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 12:20, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as a member of a national legislature. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:08, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Another ill-considered nomination from this nom, who's racking up a lot of bad AfDs in recent days. I strongly suggest that the nom review and take to heart WP:BEFORE. From a nom who's been making AfD nominations for nine years, this level of carelessness is inexcusable. Ravenswing 10:01, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• I cleaned up some cruft. Keep. Bearian (talk) 23:01, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Clearly Passes WP:POLITICIAN was a member Senate of Pakistan through there was questions on his eligibility and he resigned over his Dual citizenship as he also held Canadian citizenship.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 02:55, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Article has been cleaned us some and meets WP:POLITICIAN. I am One of Many (talk) 05:52, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.