Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashwani Mahajan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:45, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ashwani Mahajan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable person, lacks WP:SIGCOV, and fails WP:GNG. Probably WP:COI. —usernamekiran(talk) 21:22, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. L3X1 Become a New Page Patroller! (distænt write) 00:05, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. L3X1 Become a New Page Patroller! (distænt write) 00:05, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. L3X1 Become a New Page Patroller! (distænt write) 00:05, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. L3X1 Become a New Page Patroller! (distænt write) 00:05, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - many reliable and noteworthy sources available with quick web-search. Jonpatterns (talk) 14:17, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

but not WP:SIGCOV in those reliable sources. —usernamekiran(talk) 14:20, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.outlookindia.com/magazine/story/we-want-a-white-paper-on-costs-and-benefits-of-fdi/293538

http://www.financialexpress.com/india-news/government-needed-to-be-alert-to-bitcoin-demand-spike-post-demo-says-ashwani-mahajan-of-sjm/1032645/

Jonpatterns (talk) 15:09, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I found the same kind of sources when I checked. I'm not sure what the point of this AfD is. even though some of the other sources are of less depth, he is mentioned a LOT in reliable publications. Sometimes these mentions are of significant depth , as above, so he clearly meets GNG.104.163.148.25 (talk) 15:16, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - every fact is backed by clear reference, i see no problem Harsha Vardhan Pasumarthi (talk) 10:27, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note Harsha Vardhan Pasumarthi has no contributions beyond article of Ashwani Mahajan. —usernamekiran(talk) 12:20, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Coverage appears to be of adequate depth and reliability. Every reference I checked was OK. 104.163.148.25 (talk) 15:13, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.