Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashley Kerekes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 07:05, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ashley Kerekes

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems like a WP:BLP1E. Someone essentially non-notable who for one bizzare reason ends up getting press coverage. At best a minor news story and not a biography in an encyclopedia. E. Fokker (talk) 03:35, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 06:35, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

She is more notable than (for example) the drummers in minor bands, students of major scientists and articles on internet memes people have never heard of. This woman is likely going to be discussed and seen in the future. She has met heads of state, been invited to one of the planet's biggest and oldest sports events and been interviewed and reported by virtually every major news agency. If that isn't notable then nothing is.

That is the whole point of notability: are people going to look up to see who she is in the future? In this case she will be discussed in the future and wikipedia needs a biography of her - admittedly more thorough than the one I have written. To delete her page at this time seems self-defeating, especially as she is likely to become a reporter in the future and will need more written about her Torqueing (talk) 13:23, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

we cannot assume future notability as per WP:CRYSTAL. LibStar (talk) 04:03, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete clearly WP:BLP1E. If you take away her twitter account she woulld be totally unknown. LibStar (talk) 04:06, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. A clear cut case of BLP1E. -- Mattinbgn (talk) 06:59, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. -- Mattinbgn (talk) 06:59, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the above. No real notability. AssociateAffiliate (talk) 14:32, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Cool story. Am sad it doesn't appear to meet notability guidelines, so perhaps redirect to 2010–11 Ashes series and include a sentence about what happened in the Media subsection.--Milowent • ^talkblp-r 04:17, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.