Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur Patrick Bateman-Champain

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Closing early due to ongoing consensus. I'll be surprised if any new evidence appears to support keep. Missvain (talk) 22:21, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Arthur Patrick Bateman-Champain

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't access the Crickinfo link, but since the article doesn't mention his cricketing career, I'm assuming it doesn't satisfy WP:NCRICKET. He certainly isn't notable as a soldier. Clarityfiend (talk) 10:45, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:51, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:51, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete lacks SIGCOV in multiple RS to meet WP:GNG. Mztourist (talk) 04:12, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Never played first-class cricket and fails the military inclusion criteria. StickyWicket (talk) 08:29, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable cricketer, and his military career doesn't look to pass WP:GNG either. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:14, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and other commentators, non-notable cricketer and military inclusion is done on GNG now, which I can't find anything to pass. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 09:25, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable as a soldier or a cricketer. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 08:23, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.