Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur Drexler

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. RL0919 (talk) 20:13, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Arthur Drexler

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability, of the four sources two are not independent and one is just a catalog entry for a book on sale. Thus all we have left is a single obit. Not enough to establish notability.Slatersteven (talk) 16:52, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Fixed malformed AfD. WJ94 (talk) 17:03, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 17:52, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, Move it to draft if you don't think its up to mainspace just yet, but Drexler looks pretty notable; the obituary is from the New York Times, and he has a book written about his tenure as director at [[Moma Architecture and Design at the Museum of Modern Art: The Arthur Drexler Years, 1951–1986 [[1]] which appears to contain a lot of biographic material as well as his work for Moma (I can see first two chapters in google books) I added a few refs found after a quick search of JSTOR, but there looks to be more - reviews of exhibitions and reviews for the many books he wrote as well. Curdle (talk) 09:58, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Never been sure about obits, as they can just be placed by the family (and the NYT is the local new paper for New York), Moving to draft might be a good idea (and I am not sure really how to), as I still think we have a way to go.Slatersteven (talk) 10:52, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. As well as the book found by Curdle, and the New York Times article which is clearly a proper, editorial obituary, there are JSTOR 1567353, doi:10.2307/988251, doi:10.2307/3103775 and https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15436322.1957.11466192?journalCode=rcaj19. Phil Bridger (talk) 11:24, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK now we have enough to pass notability..Slatersteven (talk) 12:04, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.