Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ArthaKranti

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to 2016 Indian banknote demonetisation. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:43, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArthaKranti (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Probably non-notable. At most worth a mention and a redirect, but not an article. No real notability, and the contributor has reverted every attempt to redirect. DGG ( talk ) 06:03, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and redirect per nominator. What substantive information there is can be comfortably covered at 2016 Indian banknote demonetisation. Vanamonde (talk) 06:35, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Mark the train^Discuss 07:01, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Mark the train^Discuss 07:01, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. Mark the train^Discuss 07:01, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and Redirect--Per Vanamonde93.Winged Blades of Godric^{On leave} 07:08, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect per DGG. Whether the redirect is fully protected or the article deleted and then redirected is a matter of personal taste for want of a better phrase but I'm fine with any process that results in a redirect. DrStrauss talk 14:07, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and redirect per nominator Adamgerber80 (talk) 16:12, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and redirect as par Vanamonde. The think tank's notability seems to rest entirely on its proposal concerning bank notes. If it becomes notable for other reasons, a new article could be written. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:34, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.