Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arresto facto super bonis mercatorum alienigenorum
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Writ. Liz Read! Talk! 06:33, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Arresto facto super bonis mercatorum alienigenorum (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Another longstanding dicdef for a legal term. If not deleted, this should be merged somewhere or moved to Wiktionary. BD2412 T 05:55, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. BD2412 T 05:55, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Best 09:00, 7 June 2022 (UTC)Alexandermcnabb (talk)
Merge and redirect to Glossary of law.These writs seem to be included in more or less every book ever published on the subject. Their full names are not always used. Sometimes their names are abbreviated by books, and sometimes by the fact that Google Books' OCR has difficulty with double column pages etc. James500 (talk) 02:24, 8 June 2022 (UTC)- Merge and redirect to Writ. On second thoughts, I think that, in this case, Writ is a better target than the glossary. James500 (talk) 23:10, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:17, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect to Writ per [1]; class of identical AfDs. Iseult Δx parlez moi 07:46, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete not even sure a redirect is needed, it's an old Latin phrase. Oaktree b (talk) 14:41, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
- A writ is not a phrase. A writ is a document. It is a physical object. This is a photograph that shows an example of what a medieval writ looked like. This and this are photographs of eighteenth century writs. As you can see, these documents do not consist of their name alone. They consist of a set of detailed instructions about who is to appear at what court and what they are to do when they appear. Before 1833, the choice of writ was extremely important, because everything else depended on it: [2] [3] [4]. James500 (talk) 06:29, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.