Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Army Staff

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Per consensus, keep and move to Army Staff (Denmark). (non-admin closure) Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 20:42, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Army Staff

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No need of separate article. Can be mentioned in Defence_Command_(Denmark). KCVelaga _{☚╣✉╠☛} 16:15, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I think this article is useful for understanding the organisation of the Danish Army, something that may get lost under the Defence command page Gbawden (talk) 09:51, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 16:32, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 16:32, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - And then move to Army Staff (Denmark). There are already like named articles like Army Staff (Germany) and Army Staff (Sweden). Army Staff would better serve as a disambiguation page. EricSerge (talk) 17:12, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Per Gbawden. And move to Army Staff (Denmark) as suggested. --Pugilist (talk) 21:41, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for clarity per Gbawden, move to Army Staff (Denmark) per WP:MILMOS, and create DAB at Army Staff per WP:D. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 17:46, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.