Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arkha, Raebareli

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Snow Keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 17:42, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Arkha, Raebareli

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is about a small village, without any significant history. Any detail about this article is not available on internet or in books,So it will be quiet difficult to reference any thing written about this article

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 December 19. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:07, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Only sources mentioning the village is this and this, which only note that it is an estate in Rae Bareli. Meatsgains (talk) 21:23, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Perhaps some Indian Wikipedians can be asked to try and find some info about the village; however, if they cannot then the article should be deleted.--Fotoriety (talk) 23:48, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep per WP:GEOLAND, as a populated place that seems to be legally recognised. However, from the details given in the article, the actual name of the place seems to be Arkha Mustakil, and its geographical coordinates are 25.869°N, 81.311°E PWilkinson (talk) 14:13, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:GEOLAND. Even the delete voters verify it's a village. And how does the nom know further information on this topic is not available in books? Have they read every book in English and Hindi in history? --Oakshade (talk) 02:43, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:GEOLAND. Even has its own railway station. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:48, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
~~Delete~~:Eventhough this village has railway station but sources about this article are nowhere on internet. I am a close by resident and I know a lot about of it. It has many things that can be written on this article, but where I will find references to support my added contents. --Abhisheks 91 (talk) 17:53, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Striking vote. Note that this is the nominator. -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:48, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:06, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:GEOLAND. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:07, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.