Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arfanul Haque Rifat

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Per WP:NPOL, "major local political figures who have received significant press coverage" are assumed to be notable. The article cites what could well be such coverage, and this AfD completely fails to discuss it. For lack of a well-informed discussion, I can determine no consensus here. Sandstein 20:01, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Arfanul Haque Rifat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD; Non-notable local politician. Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. Curbon7 (talk) 21:47, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 20:41, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Mayor of Comilla isn’t a notable position, and adding some dodgy claims about drugs doesn’t really strengthen the case. Mccapra (talk) 21:25, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Since the mayors have been elected from a larger area than the honourable Member of Parliament, I think it would be appropriate to keep the article Moreover, Mayors of city corporations are equivalent to state minister. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hrksmp (talkcontribs)
  • Delete per nom Non-notable local politician does not meet GNG.93.189.6.34 (talk) 00:45, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 23:40, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.