Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Archetypes in the Old Man and the Sea, Washington Square, and The Scarlett Letter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 04:01, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Archetypes in the Old Man and the Sea, Washington Square, and The Scarlett Letter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

This is a school-type essay, not an encyclopedia article. "Wikipedia is supposed to compile human knowledge. It is not a vehicle to make personal opinions become part of human knowledge." See WP:NOT#OR. --Metropolitan90 23:42, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom, and because he spelled 'scarlet' wrong ;) - Hornandsoccer^Talk 23:59, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Well-intentioned, I'm sure, but Wikipedia is not a repository of term papers. —Celithemis 00:02, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete author blanked page a while back. --Daniel J. Leivick 00:05, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Deor 00:29, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Per nom--$UIT 04:15, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete per WP:SNOW. It is not possible to believe that this article won't be deleted. Noroton 16:14, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete per above. Baristarim 23:48, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.