Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arcane series
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. JERRY talk contribs 04:41, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Arcane series
- Arcane series (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Apparently contested prod (author deleted template without any explanation). This is non-notable web content/game. The only mention of notability from reliable, third-party sources is a passing mention in a NYT article that's about something completely different. About all that's in the article is an unreferenced discussion of the characters in the game. Gromlakh (talk) 13:57, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep Not certain if gamezone qualifies as a reliable source, but the article on that page gives "significant coverage" Corpx (talk) 08:38, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak abstain --PseudoChron (talk) 01:49, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not every thing NYT mentions is notable. John Vandenberg (talk) 20:01, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JERRY talk contribs 05:47, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete GameZone's fine as a reliable source, but the information within the interview is garnish rather than a meal. The NY Times article is literally a passing mention of no use and nothing else is coming out of google. Fails WP:WEB due to lack of non-trivial sources. Someoneanother 19:37, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Someoneanother 19:38, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.