Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apto
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. czar 18:20, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Apto (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Only routine coverage and listings like Inc 5000, and WP:AUD and WP:ORGIND failing interviews, bizjournal coverage, and such. Nothing enough for WP:CORPDEPTH Galobtter (pingó mió) 15:47, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:12, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:12, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - I agree; sources fail WP:ORGCRIT. Jmertel23 (talk) 20:27, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So said The Great Wiki Lord. (talk) 13:18, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So said The Great Wiki Lord. (talk) 13:18, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete: does not meet WP:NCORP; significant RS coverage not found. Promotionalism only. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:26, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.