Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/April West
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:40, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- April West (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Porn performer of no discernible significance. Fails all of the tenable PORNBIO alternatives; reported awards/noms are for sex scenes, which by consensus are insufficient to indicate notability. Apparently no GNews hits or nontrivial GBooks hits (name is common and brings up a large number of spurious hits). No reliably sourced biographical information. Only reference is a mislinked page which, if the proper page could be found, would only show an awards listing, so the article is functionally unsourced. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 00:57, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: BLP with no acceptable sources.—S Marshall T/C 01:17, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 04:29, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:21, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete -
- the Avn source is primary and if this is a notable subject there must be a good secondary source out there.
- the film count is inaccurate - three unreliable sources provide inconsistent numbers. Since the number cannot be WP:V it must be removed WP:BLP BO; talk 23:25, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nominator. FurrySings (talk) 08:13, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, agreed, not notable. London456 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 16:56, 20 May 2012 (UTC).[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.