Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/April 4, 1981, West Bend tornado
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Courcelles 00:07, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
April 4, 1981, West Bend tornado
- April 4, 1981, West Bend tornado (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This page goes against the NO NEWS policy because it was a onetime event and not a tornado outbrak. Tons of small towns get tornadoes what makes this one special? BabyFace98 (talk) 03:08, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Well the aftermath section for one, and the 3 fatalities. Lots of coverage (considering this is from 1981 - compare that to if it happened in 2010). Lugnuts (talk) 09:44, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep This tornado was one of the strongest in history. The article is well research. Thank you-RFD (talk) 12:23, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - As the creator of this page, it deserves to be kept. This is an anticyclonic tornado for starters, probably the strongest one in recorded history but no through research has been done into anticyclonic tornadoes. This tornado revealed flaws in the National Weather Service warning system, as well as local response to disasters. In addition it killed 3 people and injured many more, I'd call it an overlooked, but notable topic. -Marcusmax(speak) 17:57, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:13, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:13, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Plenty of independent reliable sources on a noteworthy subject. Royalbroil 03:25, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.