Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AppsFlyer

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 19:16, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AppsFlyer

AppsFlyer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article reads like an advertisement, would need rewrite to become neutral IMO (talk to) TheOtherGaelan('s contributions) 07:12, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Strong keep. It is a real and big company. I think the recent edits made it more neutral and it no longer looks like an advertisement. Happy138 (talk) 09:25, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:17, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:17, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:18, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:18, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Meets WP:GNG. Almost certainly not intended as an advert or promotion but the prose could definitely use some toning down. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 20:20, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Meets GNG. AfD is not for cleanup. Epeefleche (talk) 00:12, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Seems that the article has improved since nomination. Certainly no need to get rid of it. Pax Verbum 05:01, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.