Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apple pie shooter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 22:02, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Apple pie shooter

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are quite a few recipes on the web but I can't find any RS that discuss history, culture, or any aspect of this drink other than preparation and serving. Kendall-K1 (talk) 19:47, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the article does not cite any references or sources. Vorbee (talk) 20:13, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:43, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I am not saying that nobody ever did this, or something similar, but no references are given to verify the claim never mind demonstrate that it is notable. There is nothing in the search links to suggest that it is notable and the vast majority of the Google hits fail to verify that this drink is consumed in the stupid way described in the article, although they do verify that a drink of this name does exist. Most suggest it is drunk out of a glass, like a normal drink drunk by a normal person. The few that do agree with the article (1, 2) are not RS and they agree to a suspicious degree. This suggests that either the article content was largely pasted from there or vice-versa. Anyway, this is no good however you look at it. --DanielRigal (talk) 23:54, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a dictionary definition not an encyclopedic article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:02, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The article clearly fails WP:GNG as there is no reliable source to suggest the history and preparation of the drink and thus fails notability.Vinodbasker (talk) 12:55, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.