Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Appeon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SoWhy 16:36, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Appeon

Appeon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. The sources are all from the company's website, blogs, press-releases and those which aren't don't mention Appeon in any significant way. Cabayi (talk) 08:01, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 08:02, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 08:02, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 08:03, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per the lack of significant coverage in Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources. I found a two-paragraph article followed by an interview in this article^WebCite in ZDNet and some insignificant coverage in the Sams Publishing book PowerBuilder 9: Internet and Distributed Application Development. I did not find significant coverage about the company in my searches for sources. There is insufficient coverage to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline.

  Cunard (talk) 08:30, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.