Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aomusic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETEish given the low input despite two relists. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:54, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Aomusic

Aomusic (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Part of a promotional walled garden created by a pair of single purposes accounts. Non notable band. Only claims to satisfying WP:BAND seems to be charting (but they are on bad charts) and by having three blue linked members but for two their notability is dependent of the bands they are part of, including this one. So the are not "independently notable musicians". With few exceptions the bombardment of sources is PR, listings and Zone Music Reporter. Their charts are not good charts and they don't provide any coverage about this band. The Soundonsound piece [1] does not mention aomusic and is a Wikipedia:Fictitious references. They have a short allmusic bio ans one of their albums has a short review. Not enough. A search found nothing better. duffbeerforme (talk) 03:38, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Can't find any evidence of notability. Sam Walton (talk) 17:45, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:44, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.