Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antony Peter Mueller

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is for deletion. North America1000 10:04, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Antony Peter Mueller

Antony Peter Mueller (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

References do not verify any of the information in the article and do not prove that this person is notable. Pishcal 05:39, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:14, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:14, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:16, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:18, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:23, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - nothing suggests that WP:ACADEMIC criteria are met.--Rpclod (talk) 12:56, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. No proof of meeting WP:ACADEMIC either in the article or the subject's web (auto-)biography, only a Fulbright scholarship. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 18:59, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete for failing to meet WP:PROF, WP:GPG, and WP:BASIC. --Abaget (talk) 02:01, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.