Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antonio Walluschnig

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:15, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Antonio Walluschnig

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was prodded with the following rationale: "Unsourced, importance not asserted, could not find sources that cover the subject in any depth." Can't add much to this. GregorB (talk) 11:49, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 15:46, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 15:46, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unsourced article that does not assert notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:31, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There's no referencing here to get him over WP:GNG, and no claim of notability strong enough to grant him a presumption of notability in the absence of a demonstrated GNG pass. I'm not familiar enough with Hungarian history to definitively assert that an improved notability claim and better referencing weren't even possible, so no prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody can properly show him to be notable, but nothing here as of right now is claiming or showing anything that could make this keepable. Bearcat (talk) 16:26, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.