Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antoine Schmitt
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:08, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Antoine Schmitt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Unknown artist, no sources about its exhibitions and awards, poor google hits Nanax (talk) 10:09, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non notable as artist, no English sources. Niteshift36 (talk) 16:27, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Is the content verifiable? The awards and shows? ChildofMidnight (talk) 19:17, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The only one I'm familiar with (i.e. the one I know is notable) is transmediale, for which he came in second. I would say that's a bit on the trivial side. Problem is, there are so many art awards out there, esp. in new media, that having a list of awards is often meaningless. This is borderline. freshacconci talktalk 16:42, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. —Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 16:32, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete Borderline, but some of the claims in the article aren't what they seem. The two most striking are the stated collaboration with Chris Marker, and the exhibition at the Centre Pompidou. He provided technical assistance for Marker's Immemory CD Rom [1] and had an exhibition in the children's gallery of the Centre Pompidou [2], as well as participating in a number of seminars. A working new media artist who features on the seminar/education circuit but not quite notable enough for WP.--Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 21:24, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.