Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthropocene and Kazakhstan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 11:08, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Anthropocene and Kazakhstan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

We already have an article for Anthropocene. The rest of the article appears to be about a "Green Bridge" initiative in Kazakstahn. However the whole is much more an essay rather than a Wikipedia article and I see no notability here for the Green Bridge initiative of Kazakhstan. This appears to be a dog's dinner of an article that needs to be completely restructured and thought through and should probably be titled Green Bridge Partnership Programme, although on present showing, I would doubt whether that would meet WP:GNG. Not notable. Fails WP:GNG and has a distinct promotional feel to it. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 19:11, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Reads like an essay but could potentially be a future article if the project is notable. Cursory searches show a lot of similar phrasing to sources from UNDP and UN ESCAP, but not enough to qualify it for G12. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 19:16, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:53, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kazakhstan-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:53, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as this is apparently for the that subject specifically and there's simply nothing else to actually suggest this has achieved any solid independent notability yet. SwisterTwister talk 06:18, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.