Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Slonim

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:33, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Anthony Slonim

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Just a bloke doing a job or two; coverage due to these rather than the man himself. TheLongTone (talk) 15:09, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep and suggest nominator withdraw. He is notable for what he does... how is this a surprise? The sourcing of this article is not questionable. Numerous in-depth reliable sources, I can practically choose any of the 13 sources of the article to demonstrate this. Meets GNG 10 times over. Qualifies for automatic notability under WP:PROF (#1, #6, #7, and #8 for sure, but possibly others as well). — Insert CleverPhrase Here 15:24, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep I concur with user CleverPhrase that WP:GNG has been met to establish subjects notoriety. Cllgbksr (talk) 16:12, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:44, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:01, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:01, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep - In addition to the sources in the article, Google scholar is showing the subject has authored or co-authored numerous papers in respected journals such as NIH, AMA, etc. Easily passes WP:GNG. CBS527^Talk 20:53, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.