Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ant Raid

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. (non-admin closure) Alpha3031 (t • c) 13:24, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ant Raid

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable video game per WP:GNG. Article failed a PROD in 2020, but has not been edited since. The game has been subject to Metacritic reviews [1] but the Touch Arcade review is the only reliable source. A light WP:BEFORE does not seem to yield anything patently reliable at first glance. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 09:31, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 09:31, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete agree with the above explanation, one good review, one iffy/short review. I can only find Raid (the bug spray to kill ants). Not meeting notability requirements. Oaktree b (talk) 13:47, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:09, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Gamezebo, TouchArcade and Slide to Play are all listed as reliable in WP:VG/S. 148Apps is situational. It would seem simply from an overview of Metacritic that the game is just barely notable. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 22:31, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The 8 reviews on Metacritic are surely sufficient to flesh this stub out. SnowFire (talk) 00:52, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Inclusion of sources on Metacritic are not in themselves signs of reliability such as under WP:VG/S, but as stated by @Zxcvbnm above there are enough that do to satisfy GNG. I'm happy to withdraw the nomination at this point. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 05:05, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above; nomination has been withdrawn. - Indefensible (talk) 17:11, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.