Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anshul sdr

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 23:49, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Anshul sdr

Anshul sdr (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I've removed some previously-applied but inappropriate-category speedy and prod tags (e.g., article contains claims to notability, so had to reject A7), but the article IMO does not pass muster. Apparent vanity project as the article creator appears to be the subject. Pax 18:31, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:31, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:31, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. No indication of notability. Mr RD 16:43, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Fails WP:GNG. It was founded in January 2015 and neither has done any significant work nor has received any coverage to suggest that it is notable. — Yash! (Y) 21:45, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Self-promotional fluff with absolutely nothing to support notability. SwisterTwister talk 05:58, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as lacking evidence of in depth coverage in independent sources. Stuartyeates (talk) 20:44, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.