Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anserated

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 00:37, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anserated

Anserated (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Basically a dictionary definition. Orphaned for a decade. PepperBeast (talk) 02:10, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. The structure isn't an encyclopedia article, but the bulleted list does suggest this extends beyond a dicdef. Perhaps it should be moved to Anserated cross. —siroχo 04:24, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Visual arts and History. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:46, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:17, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• The bulleted list is mainly sourced to dictionaries. I went through 4 pages of Google Books search and it didn't turn up anything that wasn't a dictionary, before it started returning what can only be described as "other customers also bought" matches. The remainder of the bulleted list is popular culture (Goethe was ppopular.) references, and inaccurate ones to boot. The source cited for Goethe simply says, for example, that the keys look like something else that is anserated, not what the article claims. The source cited for being known for symbolism likewise actually merely says that one poet saw an answerated cross in a dream. Dictionaries and generalizations not supported by the cited sources, and nothing that I can find for improving matters. Uncle G (talk) 02:47, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: DICDEF, already exists on Wiktionary. Owen× ☎ 16:22, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nomination provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject. The first sentence doesn't make any sense Anserated refers to a condition where extremities of a creature end in the head of an eagle, lion etc. --WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 02:36, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, no better than a dictionary entry and unclear. GraziePrego (talk) 03:09, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.