Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anocht FM

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to RTÉ Raidió na Gaeltachta. T. Canens (talk) 21:32, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Anocht FM (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable radio station, Found a source on them being live for 5 years and them launching but other than those 2 the rest are forum related or trivial mentions, Fails GNG –Davey2010^Talk 21:58, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 06:28, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 06:28, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to RTÉ Raidió na Gaeltachta. This article actually misrepresents its subject: it was not a standalone radio station in its own right, but a program that aired on RTÉ Raidió na Gaeltachta. And that article already mentions it, to boot, so a redirect is appropriate. Bearcat (talk) 21:43, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect - or delete. Per Bearcat this is (was?) in effect a programming series run on an existing station. Per this article or this press release (two of very few which would seem to contribute to notability), the subject is (was?) a programming "service dedicated to younger listeners on RTÉ Raidió na Gaeltachta". In other words a series of radio programs. And not a radio station. As Bearcat notes, the current article appears to misrepresent this. In honesty I don't see enough independent coverage to support WP:GNG. WP:RPRGM is perhaps met. But only in so far as it would support a recommendation to redirect. Rather than one for outright deletion. I'd be inclined to suggest a non-admin closure and a BOLD redirect. (There isn't even any content to merge. As what content is there is misleading at best). Guliolopez (talk) 20:03, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.