Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annotary

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 08:58, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Annotary

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company, subject of one passing press mention. Company was created 4 months ago. Maybe it'll be notable one day, but it's clearly too soon. CitizenNeutral (talk) 02:19, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Article is about a social bookmarking and web annotation platform for creating collections of articles bookmarked from the World Wide Web. References are to its Alexa ranking and self-generated material, including TechCrunch coverage that the business had been launched. This doesn't yet count as significant effects on technology, history, or culture. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 17:03, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As we lack a sensible notability guideline for software, we have to rely on WP:GNG, which this fails to meet. The coverage by sites like TechCrunch at this point is essentially routine; they'll write articles about anything that looks remotely like a startup or a product put out by one. I look for more widespread coverage in tech rags, or basic coverage by more mainstream media. I'm not seeing either. It was created less than six months ago, so it's perhaps too soon, but right now it's a nope. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 05:10, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.