Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anne Bobby

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. JohnCD (talk) 17:53, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Anne Bobby

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BLP, WP:CREATIVE. Could not find any reliable sources online. Mr. Guye (talk) 04:01, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, looks well written enough with the shows she played a role in. VegasCasinoKid (talk) 05:30, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No reliable independent sources. Maproom (talk) 08:51, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:28, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep passes NACTOR with significant roles in multiple shows/movies. Maproom, the presence or lack or reliable sources in the article is not what we are !voting on in AfD. There are reliable sources showing she was in these roles which I'll add to the article. We need to look outside Wikipedia, not just at what was added to the article by an editor who poorly sourced their article. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:54, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I have been unable to find adequate references. And the fact that editors have put 21 citations in the article, which contain no significant discussion beyond the roles she has played and the statements that she is "winning"(3), "lesser-known"(4), "young" and "charming"(13), suggest that no-one else can either. Maproom (talk) 23:48, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Maproom:, I'm trying to show passing WP:NACTOR #1, which the sources show. I added the critical responses as icing on the cake. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 23:07, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -- a reasonably well sourced stub and appears to meet WP:ACTOR. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:25, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.