Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anjum Sharma

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 17:14, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anjum Sharma

Anjum Sharma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable actor. The article should speak for itself, but does not provide evidence of acting notability or general notability. The listed roles are not listed as major roles. The article states that the subject is noted for Mirzapur, but the article on Mirzapur does not list Anjum Sharma. The references listed are interviews.

Comments Independent Significant
1 Hindustan Times interview Independent source, not independent coverage
2 Indian Express interview Independent source, not independent coverage
3 MissMalini.com, a gossip sheet Interview No

Created in both article space and draft space, whether out of impatience or to game the system, so article cannot be moved to draft space. Creator of draft has been blocked for sockpuppetry. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:50, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:50, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:50, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:50, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete: As per nom. Nothing useful were also no found on doing a WP:Before. Kichu🐘 Need any help? 00:59, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 14:27, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Any of those sources coming up?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 00:26, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 02:12, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.