Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anita Valencia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗plicit 13:06, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Anita Valencia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant online presence. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 12:06, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Visual arts, and Texas. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:54, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what you mean by "No significant online presence". Seems like plenty of sources for a start to an article to me.  — Chris Capoccia 💬 14:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Skynxnex (talk) 15:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep given the sourcing and sustained coverage over the years. I've slightly expanded the article and some additional sources still appear usable on searches. Skynxnex (talk) 15:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - She is in two collections, and has at least one work of public art, which is a pass of WP:NARTIST; she may also meet WP:GNG per the sources added by Skynxnex. BTW, this article was created by a student editor for coursework this semester. I really wish people would wait to nominate these WikiEdu articles until after the semester is over. While student editors are to be treated the same as any other editor, I imagine that it must be a huge buzz kill for someone's article to be deleted before they receive a grade. Student editors are people too; it may be worth looking at the article creator, and in some instances the article talk page for this information. That's not policy, but IMO, it's kindness and helps retain editors. Netherzone (talk) 16:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • No idea even looking at the revision where it was nominated for deletion why this would merit deletion.  — Chris Capoccia 💬 18:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep seems to meet artist; I'm still unsure about having students create articles, they should go through the normal AfC process with a draft review (if they don't do this already, I don't know). Many of them end of here in AfD that I've seen over the last year. Oaktree b (talk) 18:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment M.Ashraf333, there are many articles of notable people here who have no "online presence". That shouldn't be the deciding factor in nominating an article for deletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:41, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, per comments. "No significant online presence" doesn't seem to be a cause for deletion on Wikipedia (although it's an interesting term). Randy Kryn (talk) 10:24, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Meets WP:NARTIST with works in collections and public art. Biography is appropriately sourced. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 01:35, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.