Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anita Schjøll Brede

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The sources provided by DoubleGrazing have remained uncontested. Sandstein 13:20, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anita Schjøll Brede

Anita Schjøll Brede (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject of article is an entrepreneur who lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them hence fails to satisfy GNG. A before search turns up empty. She fails to satisfy WP:ANYBIO also. Celestina007 (talk) 21:13, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 21:13, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 21:13, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 21:13, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 21:13, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose This person has delivered 2 TED-talks. Important figure with connections to billionaires.--Geysirhead (talk) 21:04, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Two TEDx, not TED, talks. There are 100K+ of these by now, with 3,000+ TEDx events taking place annually. Not everyone who gives a TEDx talk (or even two) can be notable by that fact alone. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:31, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete a non-notable businessperson.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:39, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Based on the results of a basic Google Search, she is a featured speaker or moderator at a number of industry-specific events. Together with the TED appearances and the Forbes recognition, I don't see an issue with notability, especially in her field.--Concertmusic (talk) 20:31, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Comments. Sadly, Forbes listings are neither reliable nor extraordinary. The TEDx talk might be a good source. Bearian (talk) 22:36, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Could only find this coverage in a major Norwegian newspaper [1] (but it's rather puffery-ish), the other coverage in Norway being some trade-magazine interviews and then a radio interview. Delivering TEDx talks is not in itself notable. I feel one would expect to see more coverage of her, particularly neutral coverage and passing mentions in Norwegian media, were she or her product particularly notable. – Thjarkur (talk) 10:35, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Changed to keep, the Morgenbladet and Dagbladet coverage pointed out below is sufficient. – Thjarkur (talk) 11:04, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The article is somewhat promotional in nature and the sources cited aren't great, but a quick search netted me at least these in the Dagbladet, Morgenbladet, Dagens Industri supplement, and Finansavisen, all RS AFAIK. Should be enough to establish WP:SIGCOV. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:50, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.