Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anila Singh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:28, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Anila Singh

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet notability guidelines, no depth of coverage. Bbarmadillo (talk) 20:32, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 23:53, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 23:53, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete being a PR person for a political party is not enough to grant default notability, and the sourcing is not enough to pass the GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:56, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. -The Gnome (talk) 11:59, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:12, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Being a spokesperson for a political party can be a valid notability claim if she can be shown as the subject of enough media coverage to clear WP:GNG for it — but the sources here just briefly quote her as a giver of soundbite in coverage of other things, which is not the same thing as sources about her. Not even one of these sources cuts it in the slightest. Bearcat (talk) 15:36, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete-Spokespersons from any political party at state-level, in the Indian circles are seldom encyclopedic-ally notable.Also, per Bearcat.~ Winged Blades^Godric 12:23, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG. Coverage proves that she exists and verifies her role, but is not about her (per Bearcat). --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 00:31, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.