Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angker Batu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. MBisanz ^talk 19:32, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Angker Batu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable film, appears to fail WP:NFILM as no reviews or significant coverage was found in a WP:BEFORE. Donaldd23 (talk) 14:28, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 14:28, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 14:28, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - appears to have 2 valid reviews, one in Kapan Lagi and another in Detik. Also found Curcol and John Tirayoh but these might not be reliable websites. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:15, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Still not enough to meet WP:NFO #1 or 2 in my opinion.-KH-1 (talk) 07:01, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. -KH-1 (talk) 07:01, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as per the sources identified by Spiderone that show reviews in reliable sources so that WP:GNG is passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 00:02, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.