Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angier Buchanan Duke

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Tol | Talk | Contribs 22:09, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Angier Buchanan Duke

Angier Buchanan Duke (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO. Being born into a wealthy and prominent family is not enough. The newspapers only covered his divorce and funeral. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:29, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:56, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:57, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - "The newspapers only covered his divorce and funeral". The newspaper in question being the New York Times. Even if (which I think would be wrong) you interpret this as tabloid/gossip coverage, there's this book which has a long section on the man, same with this book. Pretty clear WP:BASIC pass. FOARP (talk) 19:50, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per FOARP's additionally found sources, notability is met Nosebagbear (talk) 21:08, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.