Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Appleton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:53, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Andy Appleton

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No serious evidence of notability. Several of the references are links to pages not mentioning Appleton, others are to his own website or other non-independent sources, including promotional sites. There is one very brief piece from a local newspaper, and no other evidence of coverage in independent reliable sources. PROD was removed by an IP with no edits away from this topic. JamesBWatson (talk) 21:19, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per nom.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 01:02, 30 January 2011 (UTC)Merge to Kylie Ireland article.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 21:23, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The PROD reason was: {{quote|The subject isn't notable. All the references are either the subjects own web sites or passing mentions in reference to his wife. There isn't any major coverage in secondary sources. Notability isn't inherited in this case. Applicable policies/guidelines: WP:GNG, WP:BLP, WP:PEOPLE, and WP:INHERIT. JamesBWatson (talk) 21:30, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 23:20, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DELETE. Fails WP:NOTE and WP:RS. Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 23:53, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There's nothing really to merge to his wife's article. Whatever relates to her is already there. There's nothing here to show that Appleton is himself notable. Dismas|^(talk) 01:32, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

merge to kylieThisbites (talk) 04:40, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.