Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew de Rothschild

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was deleted by Tnxman307 (talk · contribs); reason was "Mass removal of pages added by Womblethereof". Non-admin closure. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 17:26, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew de Rothschild (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable,only primary citations Off2riorob (talk) 09:15, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It has also been suggested that this article could be a hoax. Off2riorob (talk) 09:22, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment I strongly suspect this is not a hoax [1] but I will offer no opinion on notability at present. Needs more investigation Polargeo (talk) 10:01, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay this may be a hoax. I can find no mention of him in Burke's Peerage and the usual news avenues are drawing a blank on him. Polargeo (talk) 12:03, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Hoax. Website for his company appears to have no significant history. Also need to speedy Rothschild Estates as a hoax (same creator) when this is confirmed. Polargeo (talk) 12:16, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:38, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.