Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Stoker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 10:26, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Stoker (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not pass WP:GNG, no in depth coverage at reliable sources. If, as the article says, he is best known for being friends with imam Omar Suleiman then it seems that this article makes no claim to the subject's notability. _signed, Rosguill^talk 05:18, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:26, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:54, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete No substantial coverage outside of his association with Omar Suleiman. I see a few other news articles in local coverage and passing mentions, but they don't add up to anything to suggest the world at large has taken notice of the person for him to qualify under any notability criterion per WP:N. It is possible he may qualify in the future as he appears to be active in various issues, but at the moment not quite notable enough yet. Hzh (talk) 11:25, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails WP:SIGCOV.E.M.Gregory (talk) 11:51, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.