Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew R Hutchison

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 22:28, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew R Hutchison (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Originally tagged for speedy deletion, this article does not make any claims as to the notability of the subject, and a Google search turns up nothing, either. In addition, the article is completely unreferenced, which means the vague and limited content is unverifiable. jonny-mt(t)(c) 06:06, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Unless sources can be added. Tiddly-Tom 11:05, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. —David Eppstein 23:51, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete does not meet WP:BIO artists' criteria; claims to national and international showing not sustainable. SkierRMH 01:09, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom and SkierRMH. Freshacconci | Talk 01:17, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above - violates WP:BLP. Bearian'sBooties 01:22, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per others. Nothing I can add which hasn't already been stated. Doctorfluffy 08:38, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. TGreenburgPR 05:39, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.