Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Calimach

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Lovers' Legends: The Gay Greek Myths. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 18:36, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Calimach (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An independent scholar with a self-published book. Mr. Calimach doesn't meet the requirements of WP:NAUTHOR or WP:NPROF, but Lovers' Legends: The Gay Greek Myths meets the lower bar of WP:NBOOK (two or more reviews); so I propose a redirect.

There is a short entry for Mr. Calimach in the Enciclopedia Identitatii Romanesti. It looks like citogenesis from Wikipedia. (It also misstates his year of birth and surname). I don't know that he's all that closely associated with Romania; according to him, he was born in Budapest to a Hungarian father and Romanian mother, immigrated to the United States as a child, spent most of his adult life in New York or Vermont, and as of 2009 resided in the Canary Islands. "Andrew Calimach" is his nom de plume, not his legal name. gnu57 08:10, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. gnu57 08:11, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. gnu57 08:11, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. gnu57 08:11, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. gnu57 08:11, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. gnu57 08:11, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete or redirect per nom. Not a notable person. Crossroads ^-talk- 20:26, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as non-notable. Furius (talk) 02:43, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete the coverage of him is not enough to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:49, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect. There are plenty of reviews of the one book,[1][2][3][4] although I don't see enough for WP:NAUTHOR. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 20:22, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect, the usual outcome for an author with only one notable book. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:49, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:GNG. KidAd ⑊ SPEAK 20:12, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to his notable book in the current scenario. However, I don't see his book passes WP:N either, maybe for another day. - The9Man ^(Talk) 10:20, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Lovers' Legends: The Gay Greek Myths appears most appropriate in this case. --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 18:32, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.