Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew "dewdrop" Aitken (Poet,Writer born 1985)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. User:Jimfbleak deleted the page under CSD G11 as unambiguous advertising or promotion. (Non-administrator closure.) Northamerica1000^(talk) 09:36, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew "dewdrop" Aitken (Poet,Writer born 1985) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am tentatively going to say that Andrew Aitken is non-notable (and, of course, a conflict of interest as the user is Andrew "dewdrop" Aitken). Maniesansdelire 00:18, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete, no notability claimed. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 01:25, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Do drop this speedily per A7. Clarityfiend (talk) 02:22, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 03:26, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 03:26, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 03:26, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I've speedied this, but in case it doesn't get speedied I'd like to voice that this guy has no notability. To any admins: you might want to look at blocking this guy. Evidently this isn't his first time trying to add himself to Wikipedia and has had this article deleted before. His only edits have been to spam for himself and his band. It looks like he has no plans on doing anything besides that.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 06:04, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete obvious LOL page/hoax page Bonkers The Clown (Nonsensical Babble) 06:22, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.