Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andreas Kopp

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. v/r - T P 01:18, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Andreas Kopp

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominate for deletion can find nothing to support WP:NOTABILITY on Google or in article. Has been tagged as of unclear notability for 4 years. Boleyn (talk) 18:52, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:50, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:50, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I added the one decent reference that I could find (on his Dublin commission) but it seems too light to meet the criteria. AllyD (talk) 06:54, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Looking at the list of his exhibitions in the German Wikipedia article, he just might meet ARTIST#4. However, the best sources that that article provides are [1] and [2] - which are a bit better than nothing, but probably not enough. PWilkinson (talk) 21:24, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - T P 01:37, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - T P 19:15, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per lack of notability...Modernist (talk) 12:55, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

delete insufficient sources to meet WP:BIO or WP:ARTIST. LibStar (talk) 13:57, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.