Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrea di Robilant
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Keep. enochlau (talk) 23:11, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
vanity page badbio
This person is an unknown, claiming to have written one book nobody has heard of, and the original entry, very badly phrased in telegraphic style, came from an unknown source with only IP number. further entries on the page were style improvements and wikification, the only one that added real content was spam
even if it's not a vanity page proper, it's worthy of deletion on badbio grounds--Svartalf 23:13, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable writer. Ifnord 23:39, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - minor but real author, and the book is a proper one ((not your usual e-book about Wibby, Queen of the Pixies) published by a major publisher and in reprint: see Random House catalogue. Tearlach 01:21, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and expand per above. Author and journalist. Furthermore, a link to an interview with an author is not spam. -- JJay 02:04, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Real author, published by a big editing company. Poorly written article is no reason to delete. JoaoRicardotalk 16:12, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.