Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andi Rive

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 11:40, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Andi Rive

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A dreadful, almost entirely unsourced biographical article, packed with personal and family info about this South African conservationist. I haven't speedy deleted it because there is a claim she is a "star" of a TV show. There is an interview on a wildlife website, the one citation, but this doesn't give any personal info and is mainly Rive talking about her project. Searching online I can find no reliable in-depth news coverage about Rive (the myTVnews source is a TV fan website) . Based on her less common name, you would think it would be easy to find if it existed. Though she's undoubtedly making a laudable contribution to saving African wildlife, in my view this article should be removed as quickly as possible (and if all the unsourced personal biography was removed there would be almost nothing left). Fails WP:GNG. Sionk (talk) 02:38, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:43, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:43, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Non notable woman, Fails GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 12:14, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lack of reliable sources to establish notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:58, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.