Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andala rakshasi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:16, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Andala rakshasi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Cliff Smith 17:56, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Contested PROD. No assertion of notability according to the general notability guideline and notability (films). Callanecc (talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 06:27, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:00, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

~~Comment~~. The article is terribly written, but a Google News search shows multiple non-trivial hits for this film. • Gene93k (talk) 01:04, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as improved by MichaelQSchmidt and Krzna. Coverage by reliable sources satisfies GNG. • Gene93k (talk) 23:28, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment the poor writing of its newbie author has proven addresdable.[1] Now time to expand and source. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 20:02, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and continue improvements. The film will release on August 10, and multiple sources speak toward the topic.[2] The original article was poorly written, yes... but in following up on User:Gene93k's comment, it was easy to ascertain that the topic meets notability criteria for films even with the original article in need of attention. We do not delete notable topics if concerns prove addresable[3] and, as the topic DOES meet WP:GNG and WP:NF, I would ask the nominator to consider withdrawing his deletion nomination. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 20:54, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and improve. The article is poorly written but there are many articles on the web related to the film that I believe would help improve this page - Krzna (talk) 19:55, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.