Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anastasia Blue
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:24, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Anastasia Blue (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:PORNBIO with just a scene award. Not enough coverage to satisfy the general notability guidelines. The one newspaper cited is her father in law's obituary. The lifeinlegacy.com site is of questionable reliability. Morbidthoughts (talk) 22:50, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It is difficult to make a case that this meets the rather limited criteria for being listed on Wikipedia as a pornographic actor/actress, but this particular life and death is worth documenting in a public record. As someone stated on her general discussion page, anyone who's seen her performances, in the context of when she was performing, would have difficulty disputing her notability. I rather think she fell into the WP:PORNBIO criteria involving changing the nature of performing in such content, although such assertions are definitely hard to qualify in general. I do feel the need to note that I ended up finding this article's endangered status because I was deliberately looking up the story of her life and death, so the fact that Wikipedia was there for me, but was trying to delete, it was distressing. Spawn777 (talk) 08:48, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 07:45, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. — Frankie (talk) 07:48, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this is not a notable person. Fails WP:GNG, rife with inaccuracies and inconsistencies not unlike the non WP:R sites used as references. BO | Talk 08:35, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Theopolisme 14:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This person is a complete unknown. Fails WP:BIO --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 21:08, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Nominator is correct. Fails PORNBIO and GNG. Supplied references are either unreliable or passing mentions. Searches for RS coverage yield nothing substantial. • Gene93k (talk) 01:36, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.