Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anarchopedia 2nd nomination

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS. — JIP | Talk 09:14, 30 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Damaged nomination made by another user. This article was deleted at this page, but the current verision is not IMO "substantially similar" to the version delted by consensu, so i have removed the speedy delete tag. Abstain. DES ^(talk) 05:17, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak delete This is a difficult one. I don't see a reason to delete this, except that there was a strong consensus to do it last time, and I don't think that the situation has changed. --Apyule 11:13, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. This is an easy one. The article makes no claim to notability. Anarchopedia's main page says it has a total of 148 articles. Maybe it'll be notable someday, but not yet. --A D Monroe III 16:00, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - fairly interesting, even if small. We have links to Uncyclopedia and Kamelopedia, as well as the Star Trek one. --MacRusgail 17:03, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep --Revolución (talk) 17:58, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. That is almost exactly like wikipedia. The Republican 19:56, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep. Their Special:Statistics page says that they have over 1700 pages, and it seems to be a fairly frequented website. It might be of some interest to people interested in open-content information databases like Wikipedia, so its placement here is valid, in my opinion. Frag
• Delete, has few articles and still gets few visitors (Alexa: 1,535,224). - Mgm|^(talk) 21:05, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• delete lots of issues | leave me a message 02:20, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• merge to List_of_Wikis Renata3 03:30, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, nn forum, few users, articles, and very low Alexa rank. MCB 03:42, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge per Renata3. Unfocused 03:50, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and add a link to it on Anarhcy. still contains many people's point of view and, as such, part of human knowledge on this subject --Dave
• Keep I keep seeing mention of how their meta site has only 151 articles. This is true, but Anarchopedia is not just its meta site, it is its English, Indonesian, German, Spanish, French, Croatian, Serbian etc. The reasons for delete here are that there are few articles and such, but the people saying this seem to only be going to the meta site, while Anarchopedia and the Wikipedia article about it mention the other sites. Ruy Lopez 15:24, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Wikipedia has had an article on User:Fred Bauder's Wikipedia fork called Wikinfo for around two years. It is important to be consistent. If the Wikinfo article is going to be kept, so should this one. 172 | Talk 12:31, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Further, the recent changes for [Anarchopedia http://eng.anarchopedia.org/index.php/Special:Recentchanges] and Wikinfo show contributions by about the same number of people, if not more on the part of Anarchopedia. More edits are often made on Wikinfo; but the bulk of them are by Fred Bauder and the user whom I think is the site's only other administrator. So we can't delete this article but keep Wikinfo on the basis of notability. 172 | Talk 12:39, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - notable in many languages Tedernst 21:34, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.