Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anandavani

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn by nominator. Cavarrone 10:58, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Anandavani

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:Unreferenced, WP:Notability Vin09 (talk) 08:42, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:17, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:17, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:17, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, WP:Unreferenced is not a guideline nor a valid argument for deletion. We have templates and WP:BEFORE to deal with that. About the current subject, the Telegu version of the article contains several citations, most of which appear to be reliable. Cavarrone 09:35, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw, I withdraw the proposal may have mistakenly placed it being confused with other article.--Vin09 (talk) 09:52, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.